|
<Revision Overview>
June 1, 2008 - The Japanese
Patent Office (JPO) published a notice proposing a number of
changes in the Japanese patent and trademark law. The goal
is to accelerate and optimize the strategic
exploitation of Intellectual Property
Rights (IPR) with a particular emphasis
on relieving the fee burden for
small entity status
applicants (independent inventors, small business concerns or non-profit
organizations).
There are four proposed new rules, the first of which will go
into effect immediately. The rest are projected to start January
1, 2009.
The proposed
revisions are as follows: (1)
a reduction
in patent and trademark-related
fees; (2)
revisions in the period for filing a demand for a trial
against an examiner's final decision of rejection; (3) the
updating of JPO's
electronic system to increase the number of
intellectual property offices participating in the electronic
transfer of priority documents; (4)
revisions in the registration system
for non-exclusive licensing of utility models.
<Discussion of Specific Rules>
I.
Adjustments in Patent and Trademark Fees (effective June 1,
2008)
JPO will implement an adjustment in patent and
trademark-related fees effective June 1, 2008. JPO's
patent and trademark rates have long been known to be higher
than other foreign countries, and this has been a source of
complaint particularly among small and mid-sized companies who
have taken the brunt of the cost burden. The new law will reflect
discounts in both patents and trademark fees with official patent fees
going down an average of 12% and official trademark fees going down an
average of 43%. The deepest discounts in official fees for patents will be for
those patents 10 years and older. The average
official fee for a 10 year old patent will go from $4900 to
$4300. An average 20 year old patent will go from $16,800 to
$13,400 (note: fees will vary depending upon the number of
claims in the specifications). Official trademark fees will also
come down with biggest
reductions in fees for trademarks 10 years or older. The average
10 year old trademark's renewal fee will go from $1,510 to $485
(note: fees will vary depending upon the number of
classifications). Below is a
table of the crucial fee changes:
1. Application Fees
Old fees
New fees
*International Patent applications
(approx.) $160
(approx.) $150
entering into the national
phase in Japan (under the PCT)
*Trademark
(approx.) $210 per classification (approx.) $230
per classification
2. Annual Fees/Registration Fees
*Patents (For patent applications requested
for examination on or after April1, 2004)
10-25th year: annually (approx.) $812+$64 per claim
(approx.) $612+$48 per claim
*Trademarks Registration Fee (approx.) $660 per classification (approx.)
$380 per classification
*Renewal Fee (approx.) $1510 per classification (approx.) $485
per classification
For more details on the new
schedule of fees,
click here
for a link to the JPO web site.
II. Revisions in Non-Exclusive
Utility Models Licensing Registration
(effective April 1, 2009)
Background and New Rules:
(1) The pending period from filing a patent application to receiving a
patent can take several years. However, licensing the right to
patent before a patent is granted is on the rise. This is
particularly true among University TLOs and venture companies
who are need of a cash flow to supply continued research. They
need to market inventions immediately.
In Japan, license
agreements for pending patents do not provide
protection against license transfer in the event a party goes
bankrupt. The new ownership could potentially have the terms of
the license changed, or even terminated.
The proposed
new law
will put in place a registration system which would allow
license agreements for patent
pending applications to be filed with the JPO. This
system will provide protection for
the licensee against the new owner's injunction, demand for
compensation, and contract annulment, etc., if the other party
goes bankrupt and transfers the license to a new owner.
(2) With an ever greater
demand for licensee protection, JPO promulgated a revision in
the current non-exclusive license registration's license
disclosure requirement. The new rule makes accessible certain sensitive
information only to the parties involved and not the general public.
Starting January 1, 2009. the following information will be
privileged information: licensee
name, the license's scope of claim, and the name of the
bankruptcy administrator.
(*Note: Exclusive licenses confer
rights to the exclusion of all others with a serious impact on
other parties. Therefore, its disclosure requirements will
remain the same.)
III. Extending The Period for
Filing a Demand for a Trial
Against An Examiner's Final Decision of Rejection
(effective April 1, 2009)
Background and New Rules:
JPO has responded to a long-standing complaint
that the period for filing a demand for a trail was too short.
In light of the allotted time given by other intellectual
property offices, this certainly seems to be the case: 3 months
in the U.S., 2 months in the E.U. and 3 months in China. The new
time table is as follows:
(1) For Japanese applications, the
period for filing a demand for a trial
against an examiner's final decision will be extended from 30
days to 3 months.
(2) For foreign applications, the
period for filing a demand for a trial against an examiner's
final decision will be extended from 3 months to 4 months. Prior
to the revision, the applicant was given 60 days to appeal after
receiving the final refusal and an additional 30 days
to file an amendment. The new law requires that the appeal and the amendment be filed
at the same time.
(3) For designs and trademarks, the
period for filing a demand for a trial
against an examiner's final decision of rejection and for the
amendment will also be extended from 30 days to 3 months.
IV. Increasing the number of
foreign Intellectual Property Offices to Participate in
Electronically Transferred Priority Documents
(effective January 1, 2009)
JPO has promulgated the expansion
of the number of foreign intellectual property
offices permitted to transfer electronically certified
copies of priority documents. In order to support a smooth
application process and a smooth administrative procedure, not
only will priority documents from the original countries be
accepted, but electronic transfer of priority documents from
other international offices will also be accepted.
(Posted June 2, 2008) |